1995 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2004 Mazda 6

To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1995 Jeep Cherokee. (181 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1995 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 47 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6.

Because 1995 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Jeep Cherokee (301 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (260 Nm). This means 1995 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Jeep Cherokee 2004 Mazda 6
Make Jeep Mazda
Model Cherokee 6
Year Released 1995 2004
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3960 cc 2964 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 181 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 301 Nm 260 Nm
Engine Bore Size 98.6 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.6 mm 80 mm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 1513 kg
Vehicle Length 4300 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1630 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2680 mm