1995 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1995 Jeep Cherokee. (181 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1995 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 431 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1995 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Jeep Cherokee (301 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 6. (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1995 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Jeep Cherokee | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Cherokee | 6 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |