1995 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Jeep Cherokee (181 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 1995 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Jeep Cherokee. (301 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Jeep Cherokee | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Cherokee | Epica |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 301 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |