1995 Kia Retona vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Kia Retona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Kia Retona would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Kia Retona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Kia Retona (90 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Kia Retona should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1995 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Kia Retona | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Kia | Ford |
| Model | Retona | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2490 mm |
