1995 Lada Natacha vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lada Natacha. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lada Natacha would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Lada Natacha is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Lada Natacha (70 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Lada Natacha should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Lada Natacha (119 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1995 Lada Natacha will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Lada Natacha | 2010 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Lada | Renault |
| Model | Natacha | Clio |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 119 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1650 mm |
