1995 Lada Niva vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Lada Niva is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Lada Niva weights approximately 40 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (128 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Lada Niva | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Lada | Triumph |
| Model | Niva | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1690 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 64 L |
