1995 Lada Niva vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1995 Lada Niva is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lotus Elan (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Lada Niva weights approximately 620 kg more than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 1995 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Lotus Elan (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (128 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1964 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lada Niva | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Lada | Lotus |
Model | Niva | Elan |
Year Released | 1995 | 1964 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 72.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 137 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 45 L |