1995 Lada Niva vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1995 Lada Niva is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (130 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lada Niva | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Niva | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1995 | 1967 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 57 L |