1995 Lada Niva vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lada Niva would be higher. At 1,774 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (78 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva.
Because 1995 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (131 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lada Niva | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Niva | 6 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1774 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 240 Nm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 20 seconds | 11 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2610 mm |