1995 Lada Niva vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lada Niva would be higher. At 1,774 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Lada Niva (78 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Lada Niva should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio.
Because 1995 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Lada Niva (131 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Lada Niva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lada Niva | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lada | Renault |
Model | Niva | Clio |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1774 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 20 seconds | 13 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 50 L |