1995 Lada Niva vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lada Niva would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (129 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (130 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lada Niva | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Niva | Tribute |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 50 L |