1995 Lada Niva vs. 2006 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2006 Nissan Armada is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lada Niva would be higher. At 5,555 cc, 2006 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 392 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (130 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lada Niva | 2006 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Lada | Nissan |
Model | Niva | Armada |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 5555 cc |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 106 L |