1995 Lada Niva vs. 2007 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lada Niva would be higher. At 1,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva.
Because 1995 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (128 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lada Niva | 2007 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Niva | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 60 L |