1995 Lada Niva vs. 2008 Mazda 5
To start off, 2008 Mazda 5 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lada Niva would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 5 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva.
Because 1995 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 5 (165 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (130 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lada Niva | 2008 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Niva | 5 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 83.1 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 21 seconds | 11.4 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 60 L |