1995 Lada Niva vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lada Niva would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 527 kg more than 1995 Lada Niva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (134 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1995 Lada Niva has manual transmission. 1995 Lada Niva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lada Niva | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Lada | Chevrolet |
Model | Niva | Equinox |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 98 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1737 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 71 L |