1995 Lada Niva vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lada Niva would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Compass (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Compass (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (130 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lada Niva | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Lada | Jeep |
Model | Niva | Compass |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 97 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 51 L |