1995 Lada Samara vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1995 Lada Samara is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (80 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1995 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Lada Samara weights approximately 70 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (107 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Samara. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lada Samara | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lada | Renault |
Model | Samara | Clio |
Year Released | 1995 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1287 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 80 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 107 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2470 mm |