1995 Lada Samara vs. 2001 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2001 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lada Samara would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1995 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 365 kg more than 1995 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Samara. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2001 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lada Samara | 2001 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Lada | Nissan |
Model | Samara | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1995 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1287 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2540 mm |