1995 Lada Samara vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lada Samara would be higher. At 1,597 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1995 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 271 kg more than 1995 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Samara. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lada Samara | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Samara | 3 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1287 cc | 1597 cc |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1191 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2650 mm |