1995 Lada Samara vs. 2009 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lada Samara would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1995 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Samara.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Samara. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Lada Samara | 2009 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Lada | Renault |
| Model | Samara | Megane |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1287 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 98 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2630 mm |
