1995 Lancia Zeta vs. 2006 Opel Antara
To start off, 2006 Opel Antara is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lancia Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lancia Zeta would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Opel Antara (212 HP @ 1400 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1995 Lancia Zeta. (145 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Opel Antara should accelerate faster than 1995 Lancia Zeta.
Because 2006 Opel Antara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Lancia Zeta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Antara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Opel Antara (542 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lancia Zeta. (236 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Opel Antara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lancia Zeta. 2006 Opel Antara has automatic transmission and 1995 Lancia Zeta has manual transmission. 1995 Lancia Zeta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Opel Antara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lancia Zeta | 2006 Opel Antara | |
Make | Lancia | Opel |
Model | Zeta | Antara |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1899 cc |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 542 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |