1995 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1987 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover (223 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1987 Mazda RX-7. (197 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1987 Mazda RX-7.
Because 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover (381 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Mazda RX-7. (271 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Land Rover Range Rover | 1987 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
| Model | Range Rover | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1987 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4554 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 381 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2440 mm |
