1995 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (238 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. (223 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover (381 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Oldsmobile SS. (380 Nm). This means 1995 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Oldsmobile SS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Land Rover Range Rover | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Land Rover | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Range Rover | SS |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4554 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 381 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2820 mm |
