1995 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1050 kg more than 2000 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Land Rover Range Rover | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Range Rover | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4554 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2220 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1450 mm |