1995 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. (223 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 300 kg more than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. (381 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Land Rover Range Rover | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
| Model | Range Rover | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4554 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 381 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2220 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2830 mm |
