1995 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover (223 HP) has 156 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Land Rover Range Rover | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Land Rover | Ford |
Model | Range Rover | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1995 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4554 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2490 mm |