1995 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. (223 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. (381 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Land Rover Range Rover | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Land Rover | Jaguar |
| Model | Range Rover | XF |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4554 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 381 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2908 mm |
