1995 Lincoln Continental vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 1995 Lincoln Continental is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Lincoln Continental (217 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Cougar. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 90 kg more than 1966 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Lincoln Continental 1966 Mercury Cougar
Make Lincoln Mercury
Model Continental Cougar
Year Released 1995 1966
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4599 cc 6392 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 217 HP 208 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 4600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1750 kg 1660 kg
Vehicle Length 5250 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 2830 mm