1995 Lincoln Continental vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Lincoln Continental is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Lincoln Continental (217 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 505 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Lincoln Continental (372 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1995 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lincoln Continental | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Lincoln | Triumph |
Model | Continental | 2000 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 372 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2700 mm |