1995 Lincoln Continental vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1995 Lincoln Continental is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Lincoln Continental (217 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lincoln Continental | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Lincoln | Ford |
Model | Continental | Ranger |
Year Released | 1995 | 1992 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1760 mm |