1995 Lincoln Continental vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Lincoln Continental (217 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Lincoln Continental (372 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1995 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lincoln Continental | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Lincoln | Holden |
Model | Continental | Epica |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 372 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2700 mm |