1995 Lincoln Continental vs. 2011 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chrysler 200 (283 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1995 Lincoln Continental. (217 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 1995 Lincoln Continental.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Lincoln Continental (372 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chrysler 200. (352 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1995 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chrysler 200.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Lincoln Continental | 2011 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Lincoln | Chrysler |
Model | Continental | 200 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 283 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 372 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4948 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2766 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |