1995 Lotus Elan vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1997 Mazda Midge is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Lotus Elan (163 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1997 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Lotus Elan weights approximately 54 kg more than 1997 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Lotus Elan (204 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Lotus Elan | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Elan | Midge |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1322 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1400 mm |
