1995 Mahindra Armada vs. 1967 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1995 Mahindra Armada is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Cougar (137 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1995 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1995 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 600 kg more than 1967 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1995 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mahindra Armada | 1967 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Mahindra | Mercury |
Model | Armada | Cougar |
Year Released | 1995 | 1967 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 4940 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4990 mm |