1995 Mahindra Armada vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1995 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1995 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 310 kg more than 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Because 1995 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mahindra Armada | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | Mahindra | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Armada | CLK |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2148 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1690 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4640 mm |
