1995 Maserati Auge vs. 2006 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Maserati Auge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Maserati Auge would be higher.
Because 1995 Maserati Auge is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Maserati Auge. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Maserati Auge has automatic transmission and 2006 Volkswagen Citi has manual transmission. 2006 Volkswagen Citi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Maserati Auge will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Maserati Auge | 2006 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | Maserati | Volkswagen |
Model | Auge | Citi |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1620 mm |