1995 Mazda 323 vs. 1983 Ford Fairlane

To start off, 1995 Mazda 323 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Fairlane (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 323. (82 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 455 kg more than 1995 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1983 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Fairlane (326 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 323. (168 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 323. 1983 Ford Fairlane has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda 323 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Ford Fairlane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: