1995 Mazda 626 vs. 1964 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 626 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda 626 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1964 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda 626 | 1964 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Mazda | Zastava |
| Model | 626 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2010 mm |
