1995 Mazda 626 vs. 1967 McLaren M1C
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 McLaren M1C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 McLaren M1C would be higher. At 5,818 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 McLaren M1C is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 McLaren M1C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 McLaren M1C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 1967 McLaren M1C | |
Make | Mazda | McLaren |
Model | 626 | M1C |
Year Released | 1995 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 5818 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |