1995 Mazda 626 vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 626 (161 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 54 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda 626 (217 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda 626 | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 626 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
