1995 Mazda 626 vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 626 (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda 626 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda 626 (169 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Mazda | Riley |
Model | 626 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1995 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 25 L |