1995 Mazda 626 vs. 1977 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Triumph Stag (143 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 1977 Triumph Stag (234 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1977 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda 626 | 1977 Triumph Stag | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | 626 | Stag |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1977 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 234 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 63 L |
