1995 Mazda 626 vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,314 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 626 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (111 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Volvo 240 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Volvo 240 (185 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1981 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 626 | 240 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2314 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2660 mm |