1995 Mazda 626 vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 626 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda 626 weights approximately 395 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (182 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (150 Nm). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 626 | Clio |
Year Released | 1995 | 1991 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 48 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 182 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2470 mm |