1995 Mazda 626 vs. 1992 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda 626 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1992 Nissan Pulsar.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda 626 (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Nissan Pulsar. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 1992 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 626 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1995 | 1992 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2440 mm |