1995 Mazda 626 vs. 1996 Pininfarina Eta
To start off, 1996 Pininfarina Eta is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Pininfarina Eta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Pininfarina Eta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Pininfarina Eta has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Pininfarina Eta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 1996 Pininfarina Eta | |
Make | Mazda | Pininfarina |
Model | 626 | Eta |
Year Released | 1995 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |