1995 Mazda 626 vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,519 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo XC90 (197 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 246 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 626 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2002 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2519 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2860 mm |