1995 Mazda 626 vs. 2003 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2003 MCC ForTwo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 626 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2003 MCC ForTwo. (49 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda 626 weights approximately 480 kg more than 2003 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda 626 (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC ForTwo. (80 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 2003 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | 626 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1810 mm |