1995 Mazda 626 vs. 2004 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Toyota Celica is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Celica (140 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda 626 weights approximately 101 kg more than 2004 Toyota Celica.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Celica (170 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 2004 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 626 | Celica |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 170 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2560 mm |