1995 Mazda 626 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 180 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Toyota Condor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda 626 (217 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 626 | Condor |
Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1446 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2660 mm |